Understanding Trade Policies and Their Impact on Market Performance

In early 2025, market participants have been grappling with various concerns including technology sector volatility, interest rate movements, and policy developments. Trade policy has emerged as a particularly notable factor, following President Trump's recent implementation of tariffs targeting Canada, Mexico, China, and the European Union. This raises questions about how investors should interpret these developments.

Understanding America's trade imbalance

When evaluating trade-related headlines, long-term investors should maintain a balanced perspective. Trade negotiations are complex, with tariff announcements often serving multiple purposes beyond industrial protection. The current administration uses these measures as leverage in broader discussions about border security, drug trafficking prevention, and revenue generation.

America's relationship with tariffs spans centuries, beginning during the Industrial Revolution when they were used to protect emerging domestic manufacturers. Notable historical examples include the McKinley Tariff of 1890, which imposed nearly 50%

duties on numerous imports, and the Smoot-Hawley Tariffs of 1930, which are widely believed to have exacerbated the Great Depression.

These experiences led to decades of trade liberalization and the creation of international trade frameworks. The principle behind free trade is that nations benefit by specializing in their comparative advantages and engaging in international commerce. While this approach fostered global economic growth, it also contributed to domestic manufacturing job losses as production shifted to lower-cost countries.

Recently, there has been a resurgence of protectionist policies, with the current administration, like in its first term, emphasizing tariffs as a key policy instrument. The accompanying chart illustrates America's substantial trade deficit, where imports significantly exceed exports.

Current trade measures include a comprehensive 25% tariff on steel and aluminum potentially affecting all trading partners, reciprocal duties on nations that tax American goods, temporary exemptions for Canada and Mexico, and additional measures targeting China. Beijing's response includes 15% tariffs on energy imports and 10% duties on various American industrial and agricultural products, reminiscent of the 2018-2019 trade tensions.

Tariffs have evolved significantly throughout American history

Historical evidence suggests that market reactions to trade disputes often exceed their actual economic impact. During the previous administration, markets demonstrated resilience despite trade war concerns. The 2018-2019 trade tensions did not trigger the severe global implications many feared, instead leading to negotiated agreements like the USMCA and a China trade deal.

As shown in the chart, tariffs represent only 1-2% of government revenue under "Other" sources, demonstrating their limited fiscal significance. Nevertheless, many policymakers advocate for improved trade balance to strengthen domestic

manufacturing, boost export-sector employment, and reduce foreign borrowing dependence.

Conversely, the trade deficit partially reflects robust domestic economic conditions and consumer purchasing power. Higher disposable income naturally increases imported goods consumption. Additionally, the deficit is partially offset by foreign capital inflows seeking opportunities in American markets, which helps fund domestic innovation and expansion.

Currency markets reflect trade policy developments

Since the 2024 election, trade considerations have contributed to dollar appreciation. This relationship exists because international commerce directly affects currency flows - reduced imports typically strengthen the dollar. The chart demonstrates recent dollar appreciation against major global currencies.

Tariffs can also influence consumer prices and inflation. When import duties increase, businesses frequently transfer these costs to consumers through higher prices, particularly affecting sectors with significant international trade exposure, such as electronics, vehicles, and household goods.

These developments warrant careful consideration within a broader context. While tariffs serve multiple objectives, their long-term market impact often proves limited. Despite potential effects on currency markets and consumer prices, historical precedent suggests markets can perform well during periods of trade tension.

The bottom line? While trade policies and tariffs influence global economic dynamics, their market impact is frequently overestimated. Investors should maintain focus on long-term financial objectives rather than reacting to temporary headlines.

Want to learn how Keep It Simple Financial Planning can help? Please don’t hesitate to reach out here.